SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 8569

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice N. SESHASAYEE
Microsoft Technology Licensi – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Controller of Pate – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The appellant herein, having been refused to have its Computer Related Invention [CRI] patented by the Patent Office under Sec.3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970, has approached this Court with this appeal. The appellant's invention is titled 'Delegating Instant Messaging Sessions'. In its application, the appellant has made as many as 20 claims. In the operative portion of the impugned order of the respondent, it is stated that "these programs do not have further technical effect going beyond the "normal" interactions between the program and the general purpose hardware".

2.1 Heard both sides. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that as per Sec.3(k), any invention which has 'a mathematical or business method or a computer programme per se or algorithms' are not the inventions capable of being patented. The learned counsel submitted that the Patent Office has initially brought its guidelines for examination of computer related inventions, wherein it required not only novelty in the software, but also in the hardware for a software to be patented. This was later revised by the Patent Office in its Revised Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions, 2017

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top