SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 401

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
ASHISH MUNDHRA – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT – Respondent


O R D E R

The relief sought for in the writ petition is as follows.

To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner, permit the counsel for the petitioner to be present within the vicinity of the enquiry table and also to video-graph the enquiry process, by storing the data till the completion of the proceedings in Summons No.CBIC-DIN- 202311DDJ30000222C7B, as per the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its Judgements in the case of Shafhi Mohammad Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and batch., reported in 2018(5) SCC 311 and in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini Vs. Baljit

Singh and others reported in 2021(1) SCC 184.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to appear, pursuant to the summons issued by the third respondent and he fears that during the course of interrogation, he might not be treated in a humane manner.

3.Mr.N.Muralikumaran, learned Senior Counsel appearing for

Mr.R.Gopinath, referred two judgments of the Supreme Court of India in (2019) 18; Supreme Court Cases 821 and 2023 SCC Online SC 1552 and pleaded that i) the entire proceedings may be v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top