HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
ASHISH MUNDHRA – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT – Respondent
O R D E R
The relief sought for in the writ petition is as follows.
To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner, permit the counsel for the petitioner to be present within the vicinity of the enquiry table and also to video-graph the enquiry process, by storing the data till the completion of the proceedings in Summons No.CBIC-DIN- 202311DDJ30000222C7B, as per the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its Judgements in the case of Shafhi Mohammad Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and batch., reported in 2018(5) SCC 311 and in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini Vs. Baljit
Singh and others reported in 2021(1) SCC 184.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to appear, pursuant to the summons issued by the third respondent and he fears that during the course of interrogation, he might not be treated in a humane manner.
3.Mr.N.Muralikumaran, learned Senior Counsel appearing for
Mr.R.Gopinath, referred two judgments of the Supreme Court of India in (2019) 18; Supreme Court Cases 821 and 2023 SCC Online SC 1552 and pleaded that i) the entire proceedings may be v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.