ORDER

The above Civil Revision Petition is preferred to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.169 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District Court,

Pudhukottai.

2. According to the revision petitioners, the suit properties were purchased by the 2nd petitioner out of his own income in the name of his father, who is the 1st petitioner herein and in the name of the 2nd petitioner himself. However, the respondent/plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.169 of 2022 before the Additional District Court, Pudhukottai for partition, which is clearly an abuse of process of law and filed only for the purpose of harassing the petitioners herein. It is further submitted that the respondent/plaintiff in the suit has made false averments and allegations by suppressing the material facts. The respondent/plaintiff never contributed funds for purchasing the suit properties. He had made contradictory statements in the plaint by stating that the suit properties are the ancestral properties but in another place he had stated that the suit properties are jointly purchased by them. If the respondent/plaintiff has contributed funds for purchasing the suit properties, he would not have allowed to purchase them in