HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
M/S.VASAN HEALTHCARE PVT.LTD – Appellant
Versus
M/S.INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LTD – Respondent
Insolvency - Negotiable Instruments Act - [138] - The court held that under Section 32A of the IBC, a corporate debtor cannot be prosecuted for pre-existing liabilities post-approval of a resolution plan, but this does not extend to directors involved in the offence.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner company borrowed loans and issued cheques for payment, which were dishonored due to insufficient funds. Following insolvency proceedings, the company was taken over under a resolution plan that settled creditor claims, leading to the quashing of criminal complaints against it under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that once a resolution plan is approved, the corporate debtor's liability for prior offences ceases, but the personal liability of its directors does not extinguish. Hence, the company could not be prosecuted, but the directors could still face prosecution under Section 138.
Issues: Whether the existing criminal liability of the Company and its erstwhile Directors will be extinguished following the approval of the resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that Section 32A of the IBC provides immunity for corporate debtors regarding prior offences post-approval of a resolution plan, with no similar protection for directors, who remain liable for their actions.
Final Decision: The criminal prosecution against the corporate debtor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is quashed.
The petitioner company is accused in the complaints initiated by the respondent under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. For dishonouring the cheques issued to discharge the liability, the petitioner company is facing prosecution.
2. Brief facts of the case leading to the petition to quash the complaints:-
3. According to the petitioner, as per the resolution plan approved by the NCLT, vide order dated 03/02/2023 the Company has been taken over by the successful resolution applicant M/s.ASG Hospital (P) Ltd. The claims of the creditors verified by the RP and settled on condition that all the civil and criminal litigations, investigations, enquires, proceedings causes of action, claims, disputes or other judicial, regulatory proceedings against the corporate debtor or the affairs of the corporate debtor, pending, present or future shall stand extinguished. The respondent Company is one of the creditor whose claim has been admitted by RP and settled as per the resolution plan. Therefore, the prosecution against the petitioner which is the Corporate debtor cannot proceed in view of Section 32A of IBC.
4. Relying upon the judgement of the Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Radheshyam Goenka -vs- Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 266 , the Learned Counsel for the petitioner Company submit that after the order passed by NCLT on 21/04/2017 in the application filed under Section 9 of IBC, the erstwhile Directors of the Company cease to be the Directors and they cannot represent the company after its Management vested with the IPR. Further, the claim of the creditor been settled under the resolution plan approved by the NCLT and therefore, no prosecution can sustain in view of the terms of resolution plan as approved by NCLT vide order dated 03/02/2023.
5. The respondent Company though received notice on 12/02/2024 sent through RPAD, had not participated in the proceedings.
6. The point for consideration is whether, the existing criminal liability of the Company and its erstwhile Directors will get extinguished in view of the resolution plan approved by NCLT ?
7. The petitioner Company is facing trial in the following nine criminal complaints initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Sl.Nos. C.C.Nos. Court Cheque Date Amount 1.312 of 2016Metropolitan Magistrate, (FTC-II) Egmore, Chennai.
19.09.20151000000 2.310 of 2016Metropolitan Magistrate, (FTC-II) Egmore, Chennai.
19.09.20151000000 3.311 of 2016Metropolitan Magistrate, (FTC-II) Egmore, Chennai.
19.09.20151000000 4.309 of 2016Metropolitan Magistrate, (FTC-II) Egmore, Chennai.
19.09.20151000000 5.313
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.