SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 9663

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
Manoharan, – Appellant
Versus
Gokilavathy @ Gokila – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN , J .

and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

The appeal is filed by the husband challenging the interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court at the rate of Rs.17,000/- per month payable to the wife who is the respondent herein who has preferred the maintenance petition pending disposal of HMOP.No.14 of

2021 preferred by the appellant.

2. The short point involved in this case is whether the fixation of interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.17,000/- per month is excessive or not.

3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that by preferring the appeal, the appellant has obtained an interim stay on condition that he should pay Rs.10,000/- per month pending disposal of the appeal from the date of stay but he has not paid the arrears of maintenance till the date of interim order of stay. Therefore, this Court directed the appellant herein to pay the difference amount. Accordingly, the appellant has paid a sum of Rs. 1,53,000/- by way of demand draft on 23.01.2024 and the same was recorded.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the interim maintenance of Rs.17,000/- was fixed by the Family

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top