2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 32164
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice N. ANAND VENKATESH
G.Malathy – Appellant
Versus
Union – Respondent
WP/6948/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
W.P
No.6948 of 2021
1. G.Malathy
2. P.Purusotharaj
3. Sangeetha.B
4. Athithan
5. S.Selvamuthu
6. RupaAllampalli
7. Subisha.T.K
8. A.Bactavatchalou
9. P.Kumaran
10.P.Arumugam
11.T.Kannan
12.S.Ramesh
13.L.Jayachandran
14.S.Siranjeevi
15.Palepu Chinababu
16.P.Parthiban
17.R.Umadevi
18.U.Sivaraj
19.N.Thayabaran
Petitioners
vs.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
1.Union of India
Rep by its Secretary,
Ministry of Agriculture Department and Co-Operation,
Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi- 110 001.
2.The Secretary to Government of Puducherry,
Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Department
New light House Road,
Vembakeerapalayam, Puducherry- 605 001.
3.The Government of Puducherry
Rep. by Director of Agriculture
Department of Agriculture
Puducherry.
4.The Additional Director of Agriculture (T and V)- Cum- Project Director
ATMA, Puducherry
Agricultural Complex, Thattanchavady
Puducheery- 605 009.
5.The Additional Director of Agriculture Cum- Project Director
ATMA , Karaikal,
Thalatheru,
Karaikal- 609 605.
Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to desist from
giving artificial breaks in the petitioners service and engage the petitioners in
the same post till the existence of the ATMA Scheme as Block Technology
Manager, Assistant Technology Manager, Computer Programmer, as the case
may be and thereby grant 10% enhancement in the salary annually, including
arrears and other consequential benefits flowing thereof.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3
For Petitioners
: Mr.B.Kumar
Senior Counsel for
Mr.B.Shruthan
For Respondents
: Mr.Pazhani Raja
Central Government Standing Counsel
for R1
Mr.Syed Mustafa
Special Government Pleader
for R2 to R5
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus
directing the respondents to desist from giving artificial breaks in the services
of the petitioners and to engage the petitioners in the ATMA Scheme in the
same post and grant 10% enhancement in the salary annually and for a further
direction to the respondents to pay the arrears of salary and other benefits.
2.The petitioners are contractual employees working under Agricultural
Technology Management Agency (ATMA) Scheme. The particulars of the
appointment of the petitioners is tabulated hereunder:
S.No
NAME
DESIGNATION
DoA
1
G.Malathy
BTM
19.12.2013
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4
S.No
NAME
DESIGNATION
DoA
2
P.Purusotharaj
BTM
02.06.2014
3
B.Sangeetha
BTM
11.06.2014
4
A.Athithan
BTM
19.12.2013
5
S.Selvamuthu
BTM
26.02.2014
6
RupaAllampalli
BTM
19.12.2013
7
Subisha.T.K
BTM
26.06.2014
8
A.Bactavatchalou
BTM
26.02.2014
9
P.Kumaran
BTM
02.06.2014
10
P.Arumugam
BTM
26.10.2017
11
T.Kannan
BTM
02.11.2017
12
S.Ramesh
BTM
05.03.2020
13
L.Jayachandran
ATM
26.02.2014
14
S.Siranjeevi
ATM
26.02.2014
15
Palepu Chinababu
ATM
26.02.2014
16
P.Parthiban
ATM
03.11.2017
17
R.Umadevi
ATM
08.03.2019
18
U.Sivaraj
ATM
08.03.2019
19
N.Thayabaran
CP
12.01.2018
3.The petitioners were recruited by the contractors, nominated by the 2nd
respondent. Initially, the petitioners underwent training conducted by ATMA
and on completion of the training, the petitioners have been appointed to their
respective posts.
4.The ATMA Scheme is completely funded by the Government of India
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5
insofar as the Union Territory of Puduchery is concerned. The Scheme itself
provides that the implementing authority of the Scheme shall be the concerned
State Government or the Union Territory, as the case may be. The Contractors
who receive the funds from the Government of India, should credit the salary of
the employees and it forms part of the expenses incurred by the contractors.
5.As per the ATMA guidelines, the remuneration is