MADRAS HIGH COURT
Harish Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Dhanya Prakash – Respondent
A.Nos.3929 & 3930 of 2022 in
O.P.No.513 of 2022 &
O.P.No.554 of 2023
R.N.MANJULA,J.
The petitioner in O.P.No.513 of 2022 is the father of the minor child
Advaidh Menon and the petitioner in O.P.No.554 of 2023 is the mother of the
minor child Advaidh Menon. Both the petitions have been filed by the parents
of the minor child seeking custody and appointment of guardian. At present, the
minor child is in the custody of the mother. In the Original Petition filed by the
father, he has filed two applications in A.Nos.3929 and 3930 of 2022 for
seeking visitation and for interim custody of the minor child for three
consecutive days every month and to restrain the respondent from removing the
child from the present address.
2. Ms.Geetha Ramaseshan, learned counsel for the applicant / father
submitted that various matrimonial proceedings are pending between the
applicant and the respondent and the applicant has been sincerely taking
proceedings in all possible ways for seeking custody of the minor child. It is
further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant / father that during
the divorce proceedings pending before the Family
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.