2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 34551
MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR – Appellant
Versus
K.KASTHURI – Respondent
CRP 1574 2023
1 CRP.No. 1574 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CRP.No. 1574 of 2023
and
CMP.No. 10292 of 2023
The Managing Director
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
(Madurai) Limited, Dindigul Region, Dindigul.
... Petitioner
Versus
1.K. Kasthuri
2.Bheem Sing Rawat
3.Babu
...Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, prays to set aside the conditional order dated 06.03.2023 passed
in M.P.No. 01 of 2022 in MCOP.No. 3865 of 2008 on the file of Chief
Small Causes Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner
: Mr.C. Gauthamaraj
For Respondents
: Mr.K. Livingston
---
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2 CRP.No. 1574 of 2023
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set
aside the conditional order, dated 06.03.2023 passed in M.P.No. 01 of
2022 in MCOP.No. 3865 of 2008 on the file of Chief Small Causes
Court, Chennai.
2.
The revision petitioner herein is the 3rd respondent/Transport
Corporation, the 1st respondent herein is the petitioner and the
respondnets 2&3 herein are the respondnets 1&2 in the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal Original Petition.
3.
The first respondent herein has filed MCOP.No.3865 of
2008 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehciles Act, before the Chief
Court of Small Causes, Chennai, claiming compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-
for the death of her daughter viz., Balasundari in a road accident. Before
the Claims Tribunal, the respondents remained ex-parte. After
scrutinizing the relevant records, the Tribunal awarded a compensation
of Rs.5,40,000/- by order dated 26.02.2019 to the first respondent herein.
Meanwhile, the revision petitioner/Transport Corporation filed M.P.No.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3 CRP.No. 1574 of 2023
1 of 2022 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and under Section 151
of CPC, seeking to condone the delay of 1309 days in filing to set aside
the petition in MCOP.No. 3865 of 2008, which was ordered as ex-parte
dated 26.02.2019. After perusing the records, the learned Chief Judge,
Court of Small Causes, Chennai, allowed the Miscellaneous Petition by
order dated 06.03.2023 on condition that a sum of Rs.1,35,000/- should
be deposited before the Tribunal by the revision petitioner/ Transport
Corporation on or before 27.03.2023 failing which the petition will stand
dismissed. Challenging the same, the revision petitioner/Transport
Corporation has come forward with the present Civil Revision Petition
under Section 115 of CPC.
4.
Heard both sides and perused the materials available on
record.
5.
On a perusal of the records, it is seen that when the above
MCOP was listed for hearing on 15.04.2009, since the case bundle got
mingled with office files, the revision petitioner/Transport Corporation
was not able to attend the hearing and to file a counter on that date.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4 CRP.No. 1574 of 2023
Hence, the petitioner/Transport Corporation was set exparte by the
Tribunal and final award was passed on 26.02.2019, directing the
petitioner/Transport Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.5,40,000/-.
Subsequently, the revision petitioner filed MP.No. 1 of 2022 in the above
said appeal seeking to condone the delay to set aside the exparte award
passed by the Tribunal. After perusing the records, the Tribunal allowed
the petition on condition that the Transport Corporation to deposit a sum
of Rs.1,35,000/- before the Tribunal on or before 27.03.2023 failing
which the petition will stand dismissed. It is further seen that the first
respondent has filed EP.No.743 of 2022 based on the award passed by
the Tribunal.
6.
Despite the notice of appearance served to the re