SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33998

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
Rabiath Basariya .A – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The writ petitioner claims to be the daughter in law of the third respondent. According to the writ petitioner, the marriage between her and one Abdul Gani was dissolved on 03.03.2020. Thereafter, she married Mohamed Mathani, the son of the third respondent herein. This claim is contested by the third respondent.

3. I do not want to go into the merits of the controversy. The fact remains that the petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.6 of 2022 registered on the file of the All Women Police Station, Madurai Town, for the offences under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) of IPC. The third respondent herein is figuring as the second accused in the said case.

Investigation is still pending and final report is yet to be filed.

4. The petitioner has also filed DVC No.30 of 2022 on the file of the Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai. The third respondent is figuring as the second respondent in the said petition. The petitioner has also filed DVC No.89 of 2022 on the file of the very same Court. In the said petition also, the third respondent herein is figuring as the second respondent. The third respondent is a holder of Indian passpo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top