SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11231

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
VAIRAM @ VAIRAMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent


ORDER

When the case came up for hearing on previous occasion on 24.06.2022, Thiru.R.Sankarasubbu the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that in FIR registered in Crime No.293 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Marimalai Nagar, Police Station, the name of the Petitioner was not at all found. In the same case, after completion of the investigation, when the final report was laid before the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu, the name of the Petitioner herein had been arrayed as Accused No.12 and shown as absconding Accused. Hence, the Respondent Police searched for him. Therefore, the Petitioner approached this Court seeking a direction to the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu who is expected to issue summons at the stage of taking cognizance. If the Accused fail to appear, only then warrant can be issued.

2. The Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) was already heard.

Since the submissions of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that warrant was issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu is found against the circular of the Hon'ble High Court, by the Judicial officers to provide remarks. This Court had sought for re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top