SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 16488

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
YANAM PEOPLES VOLUNTARY – Appellant
Versus
SRI.RAKSHA HARIKRISHNA – Respondent


ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the Central Information Commissioner, dated 12.10.2010, whereby the petitioner was brought within the scope of Section 2 (h) of the Right to Information Act and was directed to provide the information as requested by the first respondent.

2.The case of the petitioner is that they are an independent and private social organization who are working towards the development and beautification of Yanam town. The further case of the petitioner is that they are partially funded by the Government and for the year 2005-2006 they received 31.76% of funding from the Government, for the year 2006-2007 they received 33.28%, for the year 2007-2008 they received 26.72 % of funding and for the year 2008-2009, they received 38.67% only. Thus, the petitioner claimed that they are not substantially controlled or financed by the Government.

3.The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent who was then a sitting M.L.A submitted an application on 06.01.2009 and sought for certain details from the petitioner. The petitioner made it clear that they will not come within the scope of a public authority as defined unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top