SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11969

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice R. SUBRAMANIAN
S.R.Shenbaga Baabu – Appellant
Versus
The TANGEDCO – Respondent


O R D E R

The challenge in the Writ Petition is to the action of the Electricity Board in levying a provisional assessment on the petitioners, treating the use as commercial and charging at rates specified under the tariff LT-V.

2.The petitioners, who are practising Lawyers are occuping an apartment measuring about 357 Sq.ft. situated in ground floor of a residential apartment building at No.12, Nagireddy Street, Valasarawakkam. The petitioners were assigned LT Tariff I-A and had been paying the electricity bills based on the said premise. The premises of the petitioners was inspected on 31.01.2019 at about 12.40 p.m. and the Department found that the entire apartment was being used as a Lawyers' Office and hence, the levy should be under LT Tariff-V and not Tariff I-A. The petitioners were present at the time of the said inspection. They also paid compounding fee as well as the difference between the rates of Tariff I-A and Tariff-V for the one year, prior to the date of inspection. The respondent / TANGEDCO also passed an order stating that it is Tariff-V that would apply to the petitioners, since the petitioners are using the entire apartment for their Office purpose and required

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top