SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12393

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S. VAIDYANATHAN
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Appellant
Versus
K.SHANTHI – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

[Order of the Court was made by N.MALA, J.]

Though the Hon'ble Supreme Court is seized of similar matter, both the counsels represented that the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court has no bearing on individual grievance espoused herein. Therefore, the counsels submitted that this Bench should hear and decide the matter. On the request of both the counsels the matters are taken up for hearing and disposal.

2.As common issues are raised in these batch of writ appeals and writ petitions the same are taken up together and disposed by this common order.

3.As the batch of cases comprise both appeals filed by the Government and writ petitions filed by the private parties we propose to refer to the Government as the appellant and the writ petitioners as respondents.

4.W.A.No.894 of 2015 is filed to set aside the order dated

09.10.2013 made in W.P.No.28105 of 2013. The said W.P.No.28105 of 2013 was filed for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, directing the first respondent to promote the petitioner to the post of Instructor with effect from the date of promotion given to other similarly situated candidates as per G.O.Ms.No.95, Higher Education (C1) Department, dated 26.03.2008

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top