HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S. VAIDYANATHAN
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Appellant
Versus
K.SHANTHI – Respondent
COMMON JUDGMENT
[Order of the Court was made by N.MALA, J.]
Though the Hon'ble Supreme Court is seized of similar matter, both the counsels represented that the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court has no bearing on individual grievance espoused herein. Therefore, the counsels submitted that this Bench should hear and decide the matter. On the request of both the counsels the matters are taken up for hearing and disposal.
2.As common issues are raised in these batch of writ appeals and writ petitions the same are taken up together and disposed by this common order.
3.As the batch of cases comprise both appeals filed by the Government and writ petitions filed by the private parties we propose to refer to the Government as the appellant and the writ petitioners as respondents.
4.W.A.No.894 of 2015 is filed to set aside the order dated
09.10.2013 made in W.P.No.28105 of 2013. The said W.P.No.28105 of 2013 was filed for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, directing the first respondent to promote the petitioner to the post of Instructor with effect from the date of promotion given to other similarly situated candidates as per G.O.Ms.No.95, Higher Education (C1) Department, dated 26.03.2008
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.