JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.]

The appellant is wife and respondent is husband. The respondent filed F.C.O.P.No.2864 of 2019 under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955, read with Section 7 of the Family Courts Act , 1986, for dissolution of marriage that was conducted between the appellant and respondent on 14.09.2008 at Krishna Sri Mahal, G.S.T. Road, Pallavaram, Chennai.

2.According to the respondent, the appellant suffered multiple fracture in her right hand and she cannot use right hand properly. The appellant's family suppressed this physical defect of the appellant and respondent came to know this only after the marriage, during their honeymoon trip. Again, within 3 days of honeymoon trip, the respondent came to know that the appellant is affected with muscular spasticity over her right hand and leg, i.e., physiological disease which will affect the muscles in such a way that they will be tensed and protracted. When the appellant's parents were confronted about the suppression, they falsely stated that they already informed the respondent's parents about the appellant's physical defect. On coming to know this defect of the appel