SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 8699

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
VASANTHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE REPRESENTED BY – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.15 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem.

2. The case of the prosecution is that one one Rangasamy Udayar was the original owner of the subject property, he had a son by name Dharmalinga Udayar who had two wives, namely one Dhanakotti Ammal and Thaiyamuthammal. The said Dhanakotti Ammal had a son Muthaiyan, the father of the de-facto complainant/2nd respondent and a daughter Kodiarasu. The 2nd wife Thaiyamuthammal had two daughters, the 1st accused and one Radha. She had no male issues.

3. While being so, the said Rangasamy Udayar had executed a Settlement Deed in the year 1957 in which 'A' Schedule property was settled in favor of his daughter-in-law Dhanakotti Ammal and 'B' Schedule property was given in favour of the other daughter-in-law namely Thaiyamuthammal/2nd wife. The 'C' Schedule property was alloted to be commonly enjoyed by both the wives of Dharmalinga Udayar and after their demise, the said property were to devolve on the male heirs both existing and that might be borne by the 2nd wife and in the event of her not bearing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top