J U D G M E N T

The unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred the present Second Appeal challenging the concurrent findings of the Courts below.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for partition claiming that her father, by name K.Harikrishnan, during his life time, had executed a Settlement Deed in her favour, vide vide Document No.88 of 2006, dated 18.01.2006 at the office of the Sub-Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai. She is entitled to half share of the property and other half share was settled in favour of her younger brother Pushpalingam. However, while executing the Settlement Deed, her initial was wrongly mentioned as 'R' and her husband's name was shown as Raghupathi, whereas, her husband's name is Nagooran. She has another sister, by name Kalavathi @ Sasikala, who was married to G.Raghupathi on 12.06.1994. The said Sasikala obtained two Ration Cards in two places, one at Palaniamman Koil North 1st Street, and another one from Chockalingam Colony 4th Street. In the first Ration Card, her name was mentioned as Gunasundari and in the second Ration Card, it is mentioned as Kalavathi. In order to grab the property, she had given her name as Gunasundari, W/o. Raghupathi. Therefore, the plaintiff