HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice C. KUMARAPPAN
C.MUTHAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
R.KANNAN – Respondent
ORDER
The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order of the learned District Munsif, Melur, dated 21.03.2017, in E.A.No.109 of 2017, in E.P.No.79 of 2006 in O.S.No.983 of 1995, by dismissing the Section 47 C.P.C. application.
2. The revision petitioners are the judgment debtors. They filed an application under Section 47 of C.P.C with a prayer to declare the sale, dated 02.02.2009, which was confirmed on 11.02.2016 is null and void.
3. According to the petitioners, in pursuance of the money decree, dated 31.08.2001, the property situated in Periyapatti Village along with building bearing Door No.2/72 was brought on sale. The sale proceedings was conducted on 02.02.2009 and subsequently, the same was confirmed on 11.02.2016. According to the petitioner, the said sale proceedings violates the provisions of C.P.C, more particularly, Order 21 Rule 84 and Order 21 Rule 85 C.P.C. It is the submission of the petitioners that as per the Order 21 Rule 84, 25% of the amount should be deposited immediately, and under Rule 85, the remaining 75% of the amount along with stamp duty has to be deposited within 15 days thereafter. Further, according to the petitioners the auctio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.