SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 10707

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice C. KUMARAPPAN
C.MUTHAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
R.KANNAN – Respondent


ORDER

The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order of the learned District Munsif, Melur, dated 21.03.2017, in E.A.No.109 of 2017, in E.P.No.79 of 2006 in O.S.No.983 of 1995, by dismissing the Section 47 C.P.C. application.

2. The revision petitioners are the judgment debtors. They filed an application under Section 47 of C.P.C with a prayer to declare the sale, dated 02.02.2009, which was confirmed on 11.02.2016 is null and void.

3. According to the petitioners, in pursuance of the money decree, dated 31.08.2001, the property situated in Periyapatti Village along with building bearing Door No.2/72 was brought on sale. The sale proceedings was conducted on 02.02.2009 and subsequently, the same was confirmed on 11.02.2016. According to the petitioner, the said sale proceedings violates the provisions of C.P.C, more particularly, Order 21 Rule 84 and Order 21 Rule 85 C.P.C. It is the submission of the petitioners that as per the Order 21 Rule 84, 25% of the amount should be deposited immediately, and under Rule 85, the remaining 75% of the amount along with stamp duty has to be deposited within 15 days thereafter. Further, according to the petitioners the auctio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top