Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
Gomathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam, West Police Station, Crime No.1197 of 2021 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of theft through witness testimony and confession. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. defense arguments regarding lack of evidence and recovery. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence credibility and procedural adherence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal correctness of conviction and sentence. (Para 17) |
| 5. final dismissal of revisions and confirmation of sentence. (Para 19 , 20) |
C O M M O N O R D E R
Since these Criminal Revision Cases are arising out of the same crime, these cases are taken up for hearing together and disposed of by way of this common order.
2.Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.C.No. 56 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District have filed this criminal revision challenging the conviction and sentence passed against them. And the same also confirmed in Crl.A.No. 240 of 2023 and Crl.A.No. 42 of 2024 the details are as follows:-
SL. No.
Crl.RC. (MD).No.
Rank of the accused and Name
C.C. No.
Crl.A. No.
Charges proved under sections
Punishment (Imprisonment and Fine)
1
448/2024 A-2
Gomathi
56/ 2023
240/ 2023
U/s.379 IPC
Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- in def
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
