2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33117
MADRAS HIGH COURT
L.MAGESH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY – Respondent
HCP 370 2023
HCP No.370 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.03.2023
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.SUNDAR
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR
H.C.P.No.370 of 2023
L.Magesh
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The State rep. by
The Commissioner of Police,
Tambaram City,
Chengalpattu District.
2.Inspector of Police,
S-15 Selaiyur Police Station,
Chennai – 600 059.
3.Jebamalai
... Respondents
Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to
secure the petitioner's minor son namely Anto Avinash aged about 2 years
from the illegal custody of the 3rd respondent and produce him before this
Court and hand over to the petitioner.
For Petitioner
..
Mr.E.Sathyaraj
For R1 & R2
..
Mr.E.Raj Thilak
Additional Public Prosecutor
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
HCP No.370 of 2023
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.]
The petitioner/husband of one Jeniffer filed this petition seeking
custody of his minor son Anto Avinash aged about 2 years who is in the
custody of the third respondent/mother-in-law of the petitioner. The
petitioner earlier lodged a complaint with the second respondent on
27.02.2023 requesting to secure his minor son from the custody of the third
respondent and since no action is taken, the present petition is filed.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage
between the petitioner and late Jeniffer took place on 17.02.2019, it was an
arranged marriage and both the families participated in the marriage. After
the marriage, on the compulsion of his wife[late Jeniffer] the petitioner
shifted his residence to East Tambaram closer to the third respondent's
house. The petitioner's wife used to visit her mother/third respondent
regularly, due to which there was some misunderstanding between them.
He would submit that out of their wedlock, a male child, namely, Anto
Avinash was born to them on 07.08.2020. According to the petitioner, his
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
HCP No.370 of 2023
wife left the matrimonial home in the month of September 2022 and
thereafter, she was staying with her mother/third respondent. Despite
several request made by the petitioner, his wife failed to return to the
matrimonial home and to his shock and surprise, on 04.02.2023, the
petitioner requested that his wife died in Balaji Hospital. Thereafter, the
petitioner was asking to hand over his minor son to him but it was refused
by the third respondent, her sister, Bakkiyam and her daughter, Anitha. In
fact, on an occasion all the three attacked the petitioner and thereafter, the
petitioner made online complaint on 27.02.2023. He further submitted that
the third respondent lodged a complaint with All Women Police Station,
Chitlapakkam on 25.02.2023, in which the petitioner was summoned and he
gave an undertaking that by 04.03.2023 he would return the sridhana
household articles and other articles gifted to him during marriage and as
regards 2¼ Sovereigns of gold jewels, the petitioner undertook to return
within a period of two months. He further submits that now his only request
is seeking custody of his minor son Anto Avinash aged about 2 years.
3.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner
and late Jeniffer are relatives, it was a love cum arranged marriage took
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
HCP No.370 of 2023
place on 17.02.2019 and out of the wedlock, a male child was born to them
on 07.08.2020. He would submit that during the 5th month of pregnancy, the
petitioner's wife went to the house of third respondent/mother and from then
on, she has been staying there. He further submitted that in the meantime
the petitioner developed another relationship, due to which their separation
continued and the petitioner's wife never ret