SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 22241

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR
THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER AND – Appellant
Versus
MEENAKSHI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

(Made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.)

The respondents in the writ petition are the appellants herein. The respondent herein as writ petitioner had filed W.P(MD).No.2230 of 2009 challenging the order of the second appellant dated 30.01.2009 and the consequential order of the third appellant dated 09.03.2009 wherein the order of assignment granted in favour of the writ petitioner was cancelled.

(A).Facts leading to the filing of the present writ appeal are as follows:

2.The Tahsildhar, Devakkottai had issued an order of assignment in favour of the writ petitioner on 19.08.1989 for an extent of 4.21 acres in J1/93 in Udayachi Group, Devakottai Taluk. As per the said assignment order, the cost of the land was fixed at Rs.1500/- per acre. The writ petitioner had paid the said amount and the lands were assigned in favour of the writ petitioner. The revenue records were also mutated in the name of the writ petitioner.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai had initiated proceedings for cancellation of the said order of assignment and after enquiry, he passed an order on 04.01.2002 cancelling the order of assignment on the following grounds:

(i)The land value for the assigned land has b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top