SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13445

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice V.SIVAGNANAM
E. Purushothaman – Appellant
Versus
V. Sasikala – Respondent



DNA tests cannot be mandated without valid justification, especially during ongoing divorce proceedings.

Headnote:

CPC - Divorce - Section 151 CPC - The court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a petition for a paternity test, emphasizing the lack of valid grounds for such an intrusion during divorce proceedings.

Fact of the Case:

The husband filed a revision petition challenging the dismissal of his application for a paternity test of his wife and child, amid ongoing divorce proceedings initiated by the wife on grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the trial court's dismissal of the paternity test application was justified given the absence of valid reasons for the request, and emphasized the need to focus on the ongoing divorce case.

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the husband's petition for a paternity test under Section 151 CPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that a request for a medical examination and DNA test lacked sufficient grounds, especially considering that divorce proceedings were pending, thereby justifying the trial court's decision.

Final Decision: The civil revision petition is dismissed.

O R D E R

The civil revision petition is filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order in IA No.1 of 2023 dated 13.09.2023 on the file of the Sub-ordinate Judge at Tambaram.

2. The revision petition is the husband and the respondent is the wife.

The respondent wife has filed a petition in HMOP No.459 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tambaram seeking divorce. Pending trial, the petitioner husband has filed an application in IA No.1 of 2023 under Section 151 CPC for medical examination of the respondent wife thereby to direct the respondent wife to undergo paternity test along with the minor for further orders. The trial court, by order dated 13.09.2023, dismissed the said application. Challenging the said order, the petitioner has filed the present civil revision petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner husband submits that the allegation of the respondent wife was serious in nature against the petitioner. Therefore, it was necessary for the paternity test. Hence, seeking to allow the Revision.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that it is unwarranted to undergo DNA test for the respondent wife while the respondent wife has filed a petition for divorce against the husband. Further, a petition filed by the petitioner husband for conjugal rights, has also been dismissed for default. Hence, seeking to dismiss the Revision.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.

6. On a perusal of records, it is noticed that the petitioner is the husband and respondent is the wife in HMOP No.459 of 2015 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tambaram. Pending trial, the petitioner husband filed an application in IA No.1 of 2023 under Section 151 CPC for medical examination of the respondent and her child thereby to direct the respondent to undergo paternity test. Further, it is noticed that the respondent wife filed a divorce petition on the ground of cruelty and desertion and the case is pending for cross examination of respondent wife, PW1. Under these circumstances, filing a petition to undergo medical test and submit for DNA test in the absence of any valid reason is unsustainable. Considering the said fact, the trial court has rightly dismissed the petition seeking for submission of DNA test. I find no infirmity in the order passed by the trial court. Hence, the civil revision petition it is dismissed. The learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram, is directed to dispose of HMOP No.459 of 2015, as early as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, CMP No.3067 of 2024 is closed.

06.03.2024 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No mrn To The Sub-ordinate Judge at Tambaram.

V .SIVAGNANAM, J.

mrn

06.03.2024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top