MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.PONNUSAMY, – Appellant
Versus
R.NAGARAJ, – Respondent
CRP(MD) 2177 2019
C.R.P(MD)No.2177 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
C.R.P(MD)No.2177 of 2019
and
C.M.P(MD)No.11383 of 2019
P.Ponnusamy
... Petitioner / Petitioner /Defendant
.Vs.
R.Nagaraj
... Respondent / Respondent /Plaintiff
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, against the fair and decretal order, dated 04.09.2019,
made in I.A.No.49 of 2019 in O.S.No.63 of 2016, on the file of the
District Judge, Karur.
For Petitioner
: Mr.M.Bindran
For Respondent
: Mr.K.Suresh
ORDER
The instant Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the
defendant, aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.49 of 2019 in O.S.
No.63 of 2016, refusing to condone the delay of 691 days in filing the
application to set aside the exparte decree.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.2177 of 2019
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the
respondent are present.
3. The suit has been filed for recovery of money based on
promissory note and in view of non appearance of the defendant, the trial
Court set the defendant exparte and a decree came to be passed on
21.03.2017. The said exparte decree was sought to be set aside in I.A.No.
49 of 2019. However, the trial Court has dismissed the said application,
as against which the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
4. The learned counsel for the respondent would fairly submit
that the parties are likely to arrive at an amicable settlement and in order
to facilitate the compromise, he would fairly concede that the Revision
can be allowed for the parties to record a settlement before the trial Court.
5. Recording the fair submission of the learned counsel for
the respondent, the instant Civil Revision Petition stands allowed and the
delay is condoned.
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.2177 of 2019
6. In view of the dealy being condoned, the trial Court shall
take up the application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C and pass orders after
hearing the parties. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Index:Yes/No
12.10.2023
Internet:Yes/No
NCC:Yes/No
Ls
To
1. The District Judge,
Karur.
2.The Section Officer,
VR Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.2177 of 2019
P.B.BALAJI,J.
Ls
C.R.P(MD)No.2177 of 2019
12.10.2023
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.