SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11136

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD).No.1046 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.833 and 834 of 2023 Jainee College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul-Theni Road, N.Panjampatti Post, Dindigul, Represented by its Principal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Legal Services Authority, Virudhunagar District, at Srivilliputhur, Represented by its Chairman / Principal District, Session Judge, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Secretary / Subordinate Judge, The District Legal Services Authority, Virudhunagar District, at Srivilliputhur.

3.The Registrar, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai – 600 025.

4.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Sempatti, Dindigul District.

5.M.Arasakumar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent, the District Legal Services Authority, Virudhunagar in Ka.No.6792/2019 dated 01.10.2019 and the consequential proceedings of the first respondent in Ka.No.7115/19 dated 06.11.2019, which were signed by the second respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Parekh Kumar For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.C.Baskaran, Government Advocate.

For R-3 : Mr.J.John Rajadurai, Standing Counsel.

For R-4 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate, (Criminal Side).

For R-5 : Mr.S.Titus

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed to quash the order dated 01.10.2019 and the consequential order dated 06.11.2019.

2. The petitioner Institution is the Self Finance College affiliated to Anna University. The fifth respondent namely, M.Arasakumar joined the petitioner College during the period 2016-2017 in B.E., Mechanical Engineering under management quota. He was accommodated in the College hostel and has completed two semesters. As per G.O.Ms.No.92 Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department dated 11.09.2012, the tuition fee of the students, who are belonging to Scheduled Caste will be paid by the Government, if they attended the University Examinations. The fifth respondent being a Scheduled Caste is entitled to the benefit of the said Government Order. Accordingly, he was admitted to the petitioner College without paying tuition fees, but he has to pay other fees for University Registration, Uniforms, Books and Note Books, Examination Fee and Hostel Fee to the tune of Rs.58,000/- per year, but he did not choose to pay the same. However, the petitioner College has paid the University Registration Fee and Examination fee to him due to the welfare of the students and for continuing his studies and also granted registration number in Anna University. They also provided the Books, Uniforms, Accommodation and Food etc. The contention of the petitioner is that the fifth respondent failed to attend the College and he did not attend the University Examination in both semesters. Hence, the State Government denied to provide tuition fee which the petitioner College has paid on behalf of the fifth respondent. While that being so, during the end of the year 2018, the fifth respondent came to the College and requested to return back the original certificates, original Transfer certificates and other certificates, which were submitted by the fifth respondent. At first instance the petitioner College denied to issue Transfer Certificate, but later on the College had said that the Transfer Certificate will be issued with an endorsement of “Discontinued”. Also insisted the fifth respondent to pay the fee arrears for Hostel, University Registration and Examination fee, Book fee and Uniforms and Tuition fee, since the Government Aid for tuition fee was denied due to non-attending of the University Examinations.

3. Aggrieved over the same, the fifth respondent preferred a petition before the Lok Adalat. The Lok Adalat has issued notice to the petitioner College on 26.08.2019, 09.09.2019, 16.09.2019 and 30.09.2019. After receipt of the notices, the petitioner did not respond. Hence, the Permanent Lok Adalat has passed the impugned order dated 01.10.2019 directing the Police officials to register complaint against the petitioner. On receipt of such communication, the petitioner College has submitted a representation on 29.10.2019. On receipt of the same, subsequent impugned order dated 06.11.2019 was passed, wherein, it has directed the Anna University to submit an explanation whether the certificates can be withheld, when the student has discontinued his studies.

Challenging both the orders, the petitioner is before this Court.

4. The contention of the petitioner is that without conciliation proceedings, the Permanent Lok Adalat by invoking Section 22 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, cannot pass any orders. When the issue was raised before this Court, this Court has directed the Bar to assist the Court. The Learned Counsel, Vijay Sathya in order to assist the Court has filed the Typed Set, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3872 of 2022 has categorically held that conciliation proceeding is mandatory. The relevant portions are extracted hereunder:

23 We must now address the first issue, i.e., whether the conciliation proceedings before the Permanent Lok Adalat are mandatory before it can decide a dispute on its merits.

24 This issue is clearly resolved from a bare reading of Section 22-C. Section 22- C provides a step-b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top