SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13349

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
GOVINDHAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

All these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals arise out of the orders, dated

10.03.2021 in Arbitration O.P.Nos.59 of 2016, etc. passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

2. The appellants herein moved Arbitration Original Petitions under Section 34(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, 'the Act') before the Principal District Court, Villupuram, seeking to set aside the awards passed by the 4th respondent and to direct the respondents to pay the enhanced compensation towards their lands acquired under the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956 along with interest and solatium.

3. The learned Judge, having considered the contentions putforth by the appellants herein and the 1st respondent herein and having discussed all the aspects of the matter, came to the conclusion that the appellants have not fulfilled any of the grounds contemplated under Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in order to set aside the award and further, the Act does not confer any authority or power to the Court to enhance the compensation. While observing so, the learned Judge has dismissed the Arbitration Original Petitions. Challenging

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top