Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
S.Sivagnanam – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thazhambur Police Station, Kancheepuram District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. presentation of case facts leading to conviction. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments on the appellant's culpability and conduct. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's evaluation on evidence regarding intent. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 4. modification of judgment for compensation. (Para 24) |
| 5. final ruling on appeal and compensation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT
The Appellant/Accused has preferred this Criminal Appeal as against the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on him in S.C.No.134 of 2005 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu, dated 02.09.2016.
2.The brief facts which are necessary to decide this Appeal are as follows:
2.1.The victim/Complainant belongs to Hindu Adi Dravidar community. The Appellant/Accused belongs to Hindu Yadava community. Four months prior to 06.01.2002, the Appellant/Accused fell in love with the Victim/Complainant aged about 19 years and also had sexual intercourse with her by saying
Believing the words the victim had sexual intercourse and become pregnant. Later, the Appellant/Accused refused to marry her stating that she is Scheduled caste. Hence the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mamallapuram has filed charge sh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
