SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 8138

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
M/S.RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.)

This Writ Appeal is directed against the order, dated 15.06.2012 passed in W.P(MD)No.8027 of 2012.

2.Originally, the said Writ Petition was filed by the appellant/writ petitioner challenging the demand of damages levied by the first respondent in A.T.A.No.797(13)/2011, dated 19.04.2012, which confirmed the order of the second respondent in his proceedings in TN/RO/MDU/6072/RO/Circle.40/PDC/LD/2011, dated 25.02.2011 and to quash the same.

3.The second respondent, who passed the order impugned, had categorically held that the remittance of contribution pertaining to March, 2005 to February, 2007 was made belatedly, therefore, the levy of damages to the tune of Rs.3,66,982/- was made. The same was challenged before the first respondent herein and the first respondent also confirmed the order of the second respondent, which was listed before the learned Single Judge, who had categorically stated that the authority below had considered the case of the appellant in detail and dismissed the Writ Petition. Aggrieved by the same, the above Writ Appeal is filed.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top