SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33767

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA
S. EASWARAN – Appellant
Versus
M. SHANMUGANATHAN – Respondent


ORDER

The plaintiff has filed this Revision challenging the order dated

22.11.2016 in I.A.No.737 of 2016 in O.S.No.51 of 2015 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Ambasamudram in and by which, the learned Judge dismissed the petitioner's application seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for inspecting the schedule mentioned property along with the Sale Deeds, note down its measurements and physical features with the help of the Taluk Surveyor and submit a detailed report.

2. The brief facts preceding the filing of this petition are as follows:-

2.1. The plaintiff had filed the suit in O.S.No.51 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif, Ambadamudram for a declaration that he is the owner of the suit property and for a consequential injunction.

2.2. The suit property was described as an extent of 79 cents comprised in S.No.278/1, Old No.278, Vikaramasingapuram Village, Ambasamudram, Tiruneveli within specified boundaries.

3. The plaintiff would contend that he is the owner of the property by virtue of a registered Sale Deed dated 25.01.2010 from which date, he has been in possession and enjoyment of the property. The 79 cents in S.No.278 was subsequently subdivided

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top