SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 30040

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
S.Manikandan – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR / CHAIRMAN OF S – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The second respondent herein issued notification for filling up the post of Cook (Women and Men) calling for application from eligible candidates. The last date for receiving application was 15.09.2020. The writ petitioner applied for the post of Cook (Men) under the Reserved Category/Priority Category. He was called for interview, which was held on 08.01.2021. On the said date, the petitioner appeared before the second respondent and produced his credentials. Eventhough the petitioner fulfilled all the relevant creteria and was eligible to be appointed, till date, appointment order was not issued. Instead, what was served on him was the memorandam dated 27.11.2022 informing him that his selection has been cancelled. Challenging the same, the present writ petition came to be filed.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterated all the contentions setout in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and called upon this Court to quash the impugned order and allow this writ petition as prayed for.

4.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the impugned order does not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top