HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU
Sureshkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to G – Respondent
ORDER
J. NISHA BANU,J.
and N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.
The petitioner is the detenu viz., Sureshkumar, S/o.Sankar, aged about
28 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in Cr.M..P.No.14/2022, dated 20.04.2022 holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2 (f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of
1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.
2.We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.
3.Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would mainly focus his argument on the ground that there is gross violation of procedural safeguards, which would vitiate the detention. The learned counsel, by placing authorities, submitted that the representation made by the petitioner was not considered on time and there was an inordinate and unexplained delay.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner principally raised two grounds. The first ground is that the similar order that was relied upon by the detaining
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.