SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11363

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
N.L. VENKATACHALAM – Appellant
Versus
A. RENGASAMY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant herein.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

3. The appellant/plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.946 of 2004 before the learned I Additional District Munsif, Trichirapalli, seeking the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants etc., from in any way obstructing the passage of the plaintiff, their family members, men, agents etc., to the common well and suit properties along the ridge shown as 'AB', 'BCDEF', 'GH', 'IJ', 'BKL' and 'MN' for agricultural purposes along with cattle, power tiller and agricultural produce.

4. The plaint proceeds on the basis that;

[a] The plaintiff and the defendants are all Pangalis. The original common ancestor Lakshmanan had four sons. His first son is Onthan; the second son is Adaikkalam; the third son is Nallapethi and the fourth son is Thevan. The plaintiff is the grand son of Nallapethi and he belongs to third branch. The defendants belong to the 1st and 2nd and 4th branches.

[b] The sons of the common ancestor divided the family properties about 100 years back. Each of the four branches g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top