SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17974

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
S.VIJAYAMALA – Appellant
Versus
M/S.SHRIRAM CITY UNION – Respondent


ORDER

The challenge has been made against the Arbitral award dated

27.12.2013 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No. ACP (SCUF/EF) No.RK 117 of 2013 dated 27.12.2013.

2. The claim has been made as against the respondents for recovery of money as per the loan agreement executed by the first respondent and the other respondents stood as guarantors.

3. It is the case of the claimant that the first respondent therein has committed default. The agreement was terminated and therefore, notice invoking the arbitration was sent to the parties to the address given by them. Despite such notice, none of the respondents referred the matter to Sole Arbitrator as per the loan agreement. The Sole Arbitrator after issuing notice to the respondents has passed an award based on the documents filed directing the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.5,47,793/- jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 36% per annum. Challenging the same, the present application has been filed.

4. The main contention of the petitioner is that the award itself is challenged mainly on the ground that the notice has not been served on the petitioner namely the fourth respondent therein. In otherwise, she has g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top