Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
The Special Tahsildar(L.A)Unit II Arasu Cements Factory, Ariyalur – Appellant
Versus
Natesan (Died)1.Saroja2.Muthamilselvan3.Annathurai4.Porselvi5.Managing Director, Arasu Cements Corporation, NO. 735, II nd Floor, LLA Building, Annasalai, Chennai.6.Deputy General Manager, Arasu Cements Factory, Ariyalur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against award of compensation for land acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding market value and compensation computation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. consideration of previous sale deeds and land potentiality. (Para 11) |
| 4. court's decision on compensation enhancement. (Para 12) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
These appeals are filed by the Special Tahsildar, Unit II Arasu Cement Factory, Ariyalur, against the award passed by the referrence Court fixing enhanced compensation of Rs.1200 from Rs.250/- fixed by the Acquisition Authority. On the other side, claimants filed Cross objections to enhance the compensation fixed by the Reference Court from Rs.1200/- to Rs.1,500/-.
2. The issues involved in the first appeals and Cross Objections are one and the same and hence, they are disposed of by this common Judgment. The appeal suits are filed, challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Sub- Court, Ariyalur.
| L.A.O.P. Nos. | Dated | A.S.Nos. |
| LAOP No. 491 of 2002 | 26.04.2017 | A.S No. 916 of 2019 |
| L.A.O.P. Nos. | Dated | A.S.Nos. |
| LAOP No. 497 of 2002 | 26.04.2017 | A.S No. 938 of 2019 |
| LAOP No. 88 of 2003 | 26.04.2017 | A.S No. 926 of 2019 |
| LAOP No. 99 of 2003 | 26.04.2017 | A.S No. 930 of 2019 |
| LAOP No. | ||
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
