Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Not specified,
EPIKinDiFi Software & Solutions – Appellant
Versus
Surendar Chitoor Pandarirao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion on petition and compensation (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of employment and termination (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding contract validity and termination (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. relevant case law supporting arguments (Para 8) |
| 5. court's analysis on contract and damages (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
ORDER
This petition is filed challenging the award passed by the learned Arbitrator directing the company/applicant to pay a sum of Rs.24,00,000/- to the employee/respondent towards the damages and also the validity of the agreement/contract, this original petition has been filed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this petition will be referred to as per their array in the award.
3. The brief facts leading to filing of this petition are as follows:
3.a. As per the letter of Employment dated 19.03.2018, Confidentiality and Invention Assignment Agreement executed, the claimant was appointed in the respondent company. The agreement contains several terms in respect of salary, annual variable incentives, compensation, performance reviews etc., The agreement also provides for term and termination of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
