Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
AT MADRAS, J
Palani (dead) – Appellant
Versus
Ramadoss @ Seenu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and possession of the suit property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. trial court's decree and appellate court's reversal. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments regarding title and possession. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. legal precedents on mandatory injunction. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. counterarguments against the plaintiff's claims. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 6. court's evaluation of title and injunction relief. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 7. final judgment and orders of the court. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The plaintiff in a suit for mandatory injunction, seeking a direction to remove the Hanuman Statue in the suit property and other superstructures in the suit property, is the appellant herein, having initially succeeded before the trial Court and having subsequently suffered a reversal finding before the first appellate Court. The parties are described as per their litigative status in the suit. The brief material facts to adjudicate the second appeal and cross objection are as follows:-
2. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of the suit property, havi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
