Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup, J
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Sadagoban (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the civil revision petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discussion on the bogiyam agreement's implications. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner's request for refunds upon successful appeal. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. response of respondents emphasizing the agreement's validity. (Para 9) |
| 5. court's observations regarding evidence presented. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 19 , 34) |
| 6. court's analysis of rent control appellate authority's findings. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 49) |
| 7. conclusion ordering refund and allowing the petition. (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition had been filed seeking to set aside the judgment and decree dated 04.03.2021 passed in R.C.A.No.26 of 2018 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge at Pondicherry reversing the order in HRCOP No.46 of 2009 passed by the learned Rent Controller No.I at Pondicherry.
2. The learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner submitted his arguments. As per his submission, the Revision Petitioner herein was originally a tenant. Subsequently on 10.03.2006, he had entered into the Bogiyam Agreement. Till such date, he had paid the rent regularly. In the course of the Petitioner being a tenant there was a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
