Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, AWPS Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal principles on evidence admissibility (Para 41) |
| 2. arguments against procedural lapses (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 3. final assessment and conclusion of the case (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
J U D G M E N T
The Appellant is the sole Accused in S.C.No.135 of 2019 dated
25.03.2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore. The Appellant/Accused stood charged and convicted for the offences under Sections 376(2) (l), 376(2) (j)
and 506(I) IPC .
2. The Trial Court, vide impugned judgment in S.C.No.135 of 2019 dated 25.03.2021, has convicted the Sole Appellant/Accused as follows:-
Conviction under section
Sentence Awarded
Section 376(2) (l) of IPC
To undergo ten years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default, to undergo two years of simple imprisonment.
Section 376(2) (j) of
To undergo ten years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default, to undergo two years of simple imprisonment.
Section 506(I) of
To undergo ten years of simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default, to undergo six months of simple imprisonment.
The Trial Court ordered the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
