SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 53664

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Saravanan, J
Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dish TV India Limited – Respondent
C.S.(Comm Div).No.603 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Richardson Wilson
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Narendran, Mr.D.Prajeesh, Mr.A.Chidambaram

The plaintiff failed to establish exclusive copyright and damages for the film 'VELLITHERAI', leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Headnote:(A) Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 51, 55, and 62 - Dispute over exclusive copyright and broadcast rights of the Tamil Feature Film 'VELLITHERAI' - Plaintiff claims damages of Rs.2,25,00,000/- for infringement by the defendants - The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove exclusive rights and damages, leading to the dismissal of the suit. (Paras 1, 26, 94)

(B) Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92 - The court emphasized the importance of documentary evidence in establishing claims of copyright and the necessity of summoning relevant witnesses to substantiate claims regarding ownership and rights. (Paras 35, 60, 90)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff, a company, claims exclusive rights over the film 'VELLITHERAI' based on an Assignment Agreement dated 28.12.2007. The defendants broadcasted the film on 21.10.2018, allegedly infringing the plaintiff's rights. The plaintiff sought damages and an injunction against the defendants.

Findings of Court:
The court found that neither party adequately proved their claims regarding copyright ownership or damages, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.

Issues: The main issues included whether the plaintiff held exclusive rights over 'VELLITHERAI', whether the defendants infringed these rights, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages or injunction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the plaintiff's failure to produce necessary evidence and witnesses undermined their claims, leading to the conclusion that the plaintiff could not establish their rights or the alleged damages. The court highlighted the necessity of documentary evidence in copyright disputes.

Result: The Civil Suit stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. court's analysis of evidence and arguments. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94)

JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for the following reliefs:-

st nd a) Direct the 1 and 2 defendants, jointly and severally to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.2,25,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores and twenty five lakhs Only) towards damages, loss of business and restitution of unjust enrichment together with interest at rate of 12% per annum from date of plaint till realization;

b) Grant an order of permanent injunction restraining the first and second defendants jointly and severally, their men, staff, agents, servants, employees, programmers, assigns, representatives, distributors, dealers and all other persons claiming through or under them or however otherwise from in anyway, directly or indirectly broadcasting, reproducing, publishing, telecasting, adapting or creating any derivative works of the films “VELLITHERAI” or any part of the films or in any other way infringe the plaintiffs’

exclusive copyrights over the said movies;

c) Direct the first and second defendants to surrender to the plaintiff for destruction all CDs, DVDs, Blu Ray Discs, hard drives and any other electronic storage media containing the movies “VELLITHERAI” or any part thereof;

st nd d) Directing the 1 and 2 defendants to pay costs of the suit; and e) Pass such other or further orders.

2. Plaintiff, a company incorporated on 06.06.2007, purchases copyrights from their copyright holders of various films by paying in lump sum amounts to them to broadcast them exclusively through their channel on platforms such as cable TV, DTH (Direct to Home), TV, web TV etc. The plaintiff generates revenue generated from advertisements during the broadcast of films. The dispute in the present case pertains to a Tamil Feature Movies “VELLITHERAI” jointly produced by the 3rd defendant to the 5th defendant.

3. The plaintiffs’ case is that the Tamil Feature Film titled “VELLITHERAI” was originally produced by the 3rd defendant to the 5th defendant, Moser Baer India Pvt. Ltd., Mirchi Movies Limited, Prakash Raj respectively.

4. The plaintiff signed Ex.P2 Assignment Agreement dated

28.12.2007 with these three defendants namely Moser Baer India Pvt. Ltd., Mirchi Movies Limited and Prakash Raj respectively for a total consideration of Rs.1,25,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Twenty Five Lakhs). Thus, according to the plaintiff, the plaintiff became an exclusive assignee of copyright over the Tamil Feature Film “VELLITHERAI”

under Ex.P2 Assignment Agreement dated 28.12.2007.

st

5. It is the case of the plaintiff that the 1 defendant, in violation of the plaintiffs’ exclusive copy right and broadcast rights over Tamil Feature Film “VELLITHERAI” under Ex.P2 Assignment Agreement dated 28.12.2007, had illegally broadcasted the Tamil Feature Film “VELLITHERAI” on 21.10.2018 at 7:30 p.m. on its channel “Thiraiulagam” with Logical Channel Number (LCN) 1853. The plaintiff st thus issued Ex.P5 Legal Notice dated 03.11.2018 to the 1 defendant and nd the 2 defendant.

6. A similar suit has been filed in respect of the Tamil Feature Flim ‘BOSS (ENGIRA) BASKARAN’ in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.605 of st

2019 which was telecasted on 18.10.2018 against the 1 defendant and nd the 2 defendant herein and two other defendants therein. There also the plaintiff herein along with one Anjugam Films Private Limited sough for similar relief against the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant herein for telecasting Tamil Feature Film ‘BOSS (ENGIRA) BASKARAN’. A separate judgment has been pronounced today based on the reasoning in this judgment. The Suit has been dismissed.

st

7. The 1 defendant defended the telecast of the Tamil Feature Film “VELLITHERAI” on 21.10.2018 in its channel “Thiraiulagam” on the strength of Ex.D3 Service Agreement dated 04.04.2018 signed with the 2 defendant.

8. According to the plaintiff, Ex.D3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top