IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J
S.M.Mariyam Aysha Umma – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commonality of facts in suits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiffs' ownership and financial background. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. coercion and fraudulent transactions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The both suits have been filed seeking the relief as stated above.
2. Since the above suits have been filed on similar set of facts, submission being common, common Trial was conducted and both suits are disposed of by means of this Common Judgment. For the sake of convenience, parties to the litigation have been referred to hereunder as arrayed in C.S. No.519 of 2016.
3.The case of the Plaintiffs in C.S. No.519 of 2016/defendants in C.S. No.204 of 2020, as set out, in the plaint and Written Statement respectively, is as follows:-
(a).The first plaintiff is the mother of the second plaintiff. The first plaintiff is the homemaker and an illiterate pardanasin Muslim woman. The 2nd plaintiff is a trustee of a public trust by name "Mohammed Sathak Trust" which runs 18 educational institutions including an engineering college. The plaintiffs belong to a traditionally rich family and the plaintiffs 1 and 2 have been getting rental income of around Rs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.