Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Not specified, Not specified
M.RAJASUNDARI – Appellant
Versus
A.SILENDRAN(DIED) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal suit details and reliefs sought. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiffs' factual background and claims. (Para 4) |
| 3. defendant's arguments regarding limitation and ownership. (Para 5) |
| 4. plaintiffs' response to defendants' arguments. (Para 6) |
| 5. trial court's initial ruling. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. appellants' arguments against the trial court's ruling. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. points for consideration in the appeal. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. analysis of the plaint's cause of action. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. judicial standards for rejecting a plaint. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. final judgment and directions for trial. (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
The Appeal Suit is directed against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 45 of 2014, dated 19.01.2015, on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin.
2. The appellants/plaintiffs have filed the above suit, claiming the following reliefs:
“a) By directing the first defendant to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs, regarding the suit schedule property, failing which, the Court may execute the sale deed regarding the suit schedule property in favour of the plaintiffs.
b) For permanent injunction re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
