Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Anand Venkatesh, J
Gowri – Appellant
Versus
State rep. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. vehicle seizure under mmdr act (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on court jurisdiction for vehicle release (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of conflicting decisions (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71) |
COMMON ORDER
Assailing the orders in and by which the respective petitions filed for release of the vehicles, which were alleged to have been involved in the offence of illegal transportation of minerals and which stood seized by the authorised officers, the present revision petitions have been filed seeking to set aside the said orders and direct interim custody of the vehicles pending trial.
2. The vehicles of various descriptions, which are the subject matter in the respective revision petitions, were seized by the authorised officers u/s 21 (4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short ‘the MMDR Act’) along with the minerals, which were alleged to ha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
