SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 54778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
K.PAUL CHANDRAMOHAN B-6.MOUNT POONAMALLEE ROAD NAN – Appellant
Versus
IRUTHAYAM SUGADOSS – Respondent



in Reserved on 22.12.2023 Pronounced on 04.06.2024 C.SARAVANAN, J.

This application has been filed by the applicant to declare the Sale cum Construction Agreement entered into with respondents 3 to 15 with the insolvent as null and void and thereby set aside the consequential sale deeds and other documents in favour of the Respondents 2 to 18.

st

2. The 1 respondent herein had filed I.P.No.24 of 2016 on st

18.07.2016. At the time of filing of I.P.No.24 of 2016, the 1 respondent has stated that he had a debt for a sum of Rs.7,85,85,450/- to various creditors (both secured and unsecured creditors).

st

3. The 1 respondent was adjudicated as an insolvent by this Court by its order dated 28.07.2016.

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 28.07.2016 of this Court, st nd the estate of the 1 respondent insolvent was taken over by the 2 respondent/official assignee.

5. The facts of the case that emerged during the course of hearing st indicate that the 1 respondent-insolvent was engaged in a Real Estate st Business under the name and style of Cosy Promoters. The 1 respondent-insolvent had entered into the separate Construction Agreements with respondents 3 to 15 on various dates. Thereafter sale st deeds were executed in favour of respondents 3 to 15 by the 1 respondent-insolvent between 23.04.2014 and 21.08.2015 respectively as detailed below:-

Table 1:-

Sl.No. Name of the Owner/Flat No. Date of Construction Agreement Month of handing over of possession as per construction agreement Sale Deed/Date
1. Mr.S.Radhakrishnan, Flat No.F1 23.09.2013 February 2015 2832/2015 25.02.2015
2. M/s.Balaji & Kalpana Flat No.F3 23.09.2013 April 2015 5401/2015 08.04.2015
3. Mr.Sathya Naren Boddu Flat No.F4 23.09.2013 October 2014 16055/2014 15.10.2014
4. Mr.A.Gowri Shankar Flat No.S1 23.09.2013 August 2015 9125/2014 11.06.2015
5. Mr.A.Gowri Shankar Flat No.S2 23.09.2013 August 2015 9157/2015 11.06.2015
6. Mr.Jude Matchado 23.09.2013 May 2015 13316/2015
Flot No.S3 21.08.2015
7. Mrs.Selva Lakshmi Flat No.S4 20.09.2013 September 2014 13474/2014 27.08.2014
8. Mr.M.K.Balu Flat No.S1, S2 & F2 20.09.2013 August 2015 22.03.2015
9. Mr.G.Vinodkumar Flat No.S1 23.09.2013 March 2015 18.03.2015
10. Mr.S.Irudhaya Johnson Flat No.F2 20.09.2013 June 2014 8786/2014 05.06.2014
11. Mr.Muthuramalingam Flat No.F6 01.06.2013 June 2014 9573/2014 18.06.2014
12. Mr.Y.Balakrishnan Reddy Flat No.F5 04.09.2013 April 2014 7339/2014 12.05.2014
13. Mr.R.Arumugam Flat No.S5 20.09.2013 July 2014 11120/2014 11.07.2014
14. Mrs.Y.Gowthami Flat No.S6 17.09.2013 April 2014 6302/2014 23.04.2014
th th

6. The 9 respondent has subsequently sold the properties to 16 , th th th th th

17 and 18 respondent. Thus, 16 , 17 and 18 respondent have been arrayed as respondents in this Application.

7. The above Sale –cum-Construction Agreements which were st signed by the 1 respondent- insolvent in favour of the 3-15 respondents were both unregistered and were under-stamped. These construction st agreements were for allotting flats promoted by the 1 respondent insolvent. Prima-facie these agreements were contrary to Section 17(1)(f)

of the Registration Act, 1908 as amended with effect from 01.12.2012 read with Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and Article 5 of Schedule I to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 which will warrant proceedings under the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and Registration Act, 1908.

8. Section 17(1)(f) of the Registration Act, 1908 as amended with effect from 01.12.2012 reads as under:-

17(1)(f) Instruments of agreement relating to construction of building as referred to in clause (i) under Article 5 of Schedule I to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Central Act II of 1899)”

st

9. Pursuant to the Sale-cum-Construction Agreements, the 1 respondent-insolvent has also executed Sale Deeds on various dates in rd th favour of the 3 respondent to 15 respondent on various dates which are also under challenge by the applicant.

10. The Appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top