SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 62199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
D.NAVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.06.2024 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.16781 of 2024 and WMP.Nos.18446 & 18447 of 2024 D. Naveen Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Inspector General of Registration

100, Santhome Highway Road, Chennai 600 028.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Integrated Building Complex, Kumaragiri Bypass road, Near Kailash Manasarovar CBSE School, Near Udayapatty Power House, Ammapet, Salem 636 014.

3. The District Registrar, Salem (West)

No.313, 3rd floor, District Collectors' Office, Salem 636 001.

4. Gopi Balan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take departmental action against the 4th respondent for his dereliction of duty and misbehaviour and harassement done to the petitioner by considering his complaint / representation dated 22.06.2023, 20.02.2024, 20.04.2024 sent to the respondents 1 to 3.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabakar For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hassan Fizal Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take departmental action against the 4th respondent for his dereliction of duty and misbehaviour and harassement done to the petitioner by considering his complaint / representation dated 22.06.2023, 20.02.2024, 20.04.2024 sent to the respondents 1 to 3.

2. The petitioner is a practicing advocate and has sent a complaint against the 4th respondent relating to the non-registering of a document showing the attachment entry. It is the contention of the petitioner that even if there is an attachment, the 4th respondent has no power to refuse the document. In any event, when the petitioner also produced the order of raising the attachment even then registration was refused and he was ill-treated.

Therefore, the petitioner has sent a detail complaint in this regard.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents submitted that the complaint would be looked into in the manner known to law and accordingly action will be taken by the third respondent.

4. As far as taking departmental action is concerned, it is within the domain of the respondent authority and the complainant whoever sent a complaint does not have concomitant right to enforce the complaint or insist upon. However, recording the above submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

28.06.2024 Neutral Citation: Yes/No dpq D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

dpq To

1. Inspector General of Registration

100, Santhome Highway Road, Chennai 600 028.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Integrated Building Complex, Kumaragiri Bypass road, Near Kailash Manasarovar CBSE School, Near Udayapatty Power House, Ammapet, Salem 636 014.

3. The District Registrar, Salem (West)

No.313, 3rd floor, District Collectors' Office, Salem 636 001.

W.P.No.16781 of 2024 and WMP.Nos.18446 & 18447 of 2024

28.06.2024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top