Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice N. Sathish Kumar, J
G.S.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Director, Director of Town and Country Planning – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed for removal of corporation's name from land records. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue that land reserved for public purposes cannot be sold. (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioner's counsel claims right to sell land reserved for community hall. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. counterarguments emphasize public purpose reservation limits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court reviews legal obligations of landowners in layout approvals. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. clarifications on land reservation for public purposes provided. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court asserts land reserved for community hall can be sold with restrictions. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. judicial precedents support the right to sell reserved land under conditions. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 9. emphasis on procedural acquisition rights for public purpose land. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. court's directive to remove corporation's name from land records. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to remove the 3rd respondent's name in the Extract from the Town Survey Land Register dated 28.08.2018 in respect of the petitioner's property measurin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
