SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 69263

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice N. Sathish Kumar, J
G.S.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Director, Director of Town and Country Planning – Respondent
Writ Petition No.12853 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Mukunth, Senior Counsel for Mr.P.Tamilvel
For the Respondents: Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for RR1, 2 & 4, Mr.K.Magesh, Standing Counsel for R3

Land reserved for community purposes remains saleable, provided it is used for the intended purpose, and local authorities cannot claim ownership without a legal transfer.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Writ of Mandamus sought to remove the name of the corporation from Town Survey Land Register regarding a community hall site - Petitioners acquired land through sale and settlement deeds and claimed ownership - Respondents contended land reserved for public purposes cannot be alienated - Court held that petitioners retained saleable rights for community hall site, and the corporation's claim was invalid due to lack of title transfer. (Paras 30, 31, 33)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners acquired a community hall site in Vilankurichi Village, Coimbatore, through sale and settlement deeds after layout approval. The 3rd respondent corporation claimed the site was reserved for public purposes and changed the TSLR records to reflect this, prompting the petitioners to seek judicial intervention.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners retained their rights over the community hall site, as it was not transferred to the corporation. The action of the corporation in changing the TSLR was deemed invalid.

Issues: Whether the petitioners retained ownership of the community hall site and if the corporation had a valid claim over it.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that land reserved for community purposes remains saleable, provided it is used for the intended purpose, and the corporation's actions lacked legal basis.

Result: Writ petition disposed of directing the removal of the corporation's name from TSLR.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for removal of corporation's name from land records. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents argue that land reserved for public purposes cannot be sold. (Para 4)
3. petitioner's counsel claims right to sell land reserved for community hall. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. counterarguments emphasize public purpose reservation limits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. court reviews legal obligations of landowners in layout approvals. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. clarifications on land reservation for public purposes provided. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. court asserts land reserved for community hall can be sold with restrictions. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
8. judicial precedents support the right to sell reserved land under conditions. (Para 25 , 26)
9. emphasis on procedural acquisition rights for public purpose land. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
10. court's directive to remove corporation's name from land records. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to remove the 3rd respondent's name in the Extract from the Town Survey Land Register dated 28.08.2018 in respect of the petitioner's property measuring an extent of 3682 square meter – Community Hall site comprised in S.F.Nos.380, 381 and 373(Part) of Vilankurichi Village situate at Gurusamy Nagar, Vilankurichi Village, Coimbatore District.

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition are as follows:-

(i) A larger extent of land measuring Acres 18.16 Cents comprised in S.No.373 (part), 380 and 381 situate at Vilankurichi Village of Coimbatore Corporation was promoted as house sites and the layout was named as Gurusamy Nagar. Approval was granted by local planning authority, Coimbatore in L.P/R (CPN) No.69/87. As part of the layout a reserved site for constructing community hall was promoted.

(ii) The petitioners acquired the above said site comprised in S.F.Nos.380 & 381 of Vilankurichi village within the limit of Coimbatore Corporation under two different sale deeds dated 16.07.1990 registered as Doc.Nos.4226 of 1990 and 4227 of 1990 and two settlement deeds dated 19.10.2009 registered as Doc.Nos.4384 of 2009 and 4385 of 2009 respectively. The petitioner acquired the said land after the layout approval accorded by the office of the 2nd respondent and 4th respondent vide order dated 21.07.1988 in Na.Ka.No.126630/1987/H.13 in S.F.Nos.380, 381 and 373 (part). The total extent of layout is 7.3475 Hectares (Acres 18.16 Cents). The extent allotted for public purposes are, 3929 square meters for park, 3682 square meters, 468 square meters for Shop-1, and 207 square meters for Shop-2.

(iii) Subsequently, the 1st respondent by circular dated 24.05.1985 issued under Roc.No.18150/85-GL, clarified that as the word "Reserved Lands" stipulated in the layout condition mentioned above requires explicit definition as the lands reserved in the layout would include Park, Play Field, Community Halls, Kalyana Mandapams, etc.,it was felt that it would be sufficient if the area reserved as open space , like Park, Play Field, Children Play Space alone need to be handed over to the executive authority of the local body concerned as they essentially belong to the category of non-commercial public purposes. As the other reservations like Kalyana Mandapams, Community Halls, etc., belong to commercial category, it was felt that the layout owner should not be deprived of income which he may likely to get by disposal of these plots as he has to make surrender to Executive Authority of the local body a sizeable amount of land by way of non-commercial open spaces, instructions have already been issued by office circular in Roc.No.9798/1983-BCC dated 29.06.1984 that in layouts which are of less than 10 Acres in extent, 10% of such area should be reserved only for open spaces such as, parks, play fields, etc., and in cases of layout more than 10 Acres in extent, 50% of the total reservation may be provided for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top