SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72808

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Peter Raj @ Gangar Peter Raj – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 05.09.2024 CORAM The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP(MD). Nos.13385 & 13392 of 2023 CRL OP(MD). No.13385 of 2023

1.Peter Raj @ Gangar Peter Raj

2.Siluvai Vino @ Vino

3.Arul Glen @ Arul ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Koodankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2.Soosai Irudhayraj ... Respondents PRAYER :- This Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.366 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar for R2 CRL OP(MD). No.13392 of 2023

1. Soosai Irudhayraj @ Raja

2.Asirvatham

3.Amirthaselvi @ Selvi

3.Irudhaya Josephin Mallika @ Mallika ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Koodankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2.Arul @ Arul Glen ... Respondents PRAYER :- This Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.457 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr. T.Lenin Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr. D.Venkatesh for R2

COMMON ORDER

These Petitions are filed to quash the cases in C.C.No.366 of 2023 and C.C.No.457 of 2023, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to quash the cases on compromise.

3. Considering the nature of allegations, in which major attracted offence is Section 506(ii) I.P.C and considering the joint compromise memos which are filed and the same is duly verified by the High Court Legal Services Committee pursuant to the earlier order of this Court, and after considering the nature of statements given by the listed witnesses in both the cases, I am of the view that the case falls within the nature of private dispute between the parties and within the four corners of the compoundable cases as enunciated by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab & Another reported in 2012(10)

SCC-303

4. In view there of these Criminal Original Petitions stand allowed the proceedings in C.C.No.366 of 2023 and 457 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram shall stand quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order.

05.09.2024 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/ No NCC : Yes/No LS D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J LS TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram.

2. The Inspector of Police, Koodankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.13385 & 13392 of 2023 Date : 05.09.2024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top