IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 13.09.2024 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA Rev.Apln.No.101 of 2024 in W.P.No.29823 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.29427 of 2023

1. M/s.Cee Dee Yes Housing and Infrastructure Private Limited, (Formerly Cee Dee Yes Housing and Finance Ltd.,)

Rep. by its Managing Director, No.42, 2nd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 040.

2. M/s.Cee Dee Yes Housing and Infrastructure Private Limited, (Formerly Cee Dee Yes Housing and Finance Ltd.,)

Rep. by its Managing Director, No.383, Velachery Tambaram Road, Velachery, Chennai - 600 042.

3. C.Devadasasundaram ... Petitioners Vs.

1. Regal Palm Garden Apartment Owners Association, Represented by its Secretary, Mrs.Ahalyakumari.E No.383, Velachery Tambaram Road, Velachery, Chennai - 600 042.

2. M/s.Standard Fire Works Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, 1/3, Thirthangal Road, Sivakasi - 626 123.

3. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

4. The Housing Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

5. The Sub-Registrar, Velachery, O/o, the SRO Velachery, Velachery, Chennai.

6. M/s.Cee Dee Yes Property Services, No.42, 2nd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adayar, Chennai - 600 040.

7. Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai - 600 003. ..Respondents PRAYER: The Review Application is filed under Section 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. to review the order dated 27.03.2024 in W.P.No.29823 of 2023 passed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Jayaraman For Respondents : Mr.Muralikumaran for R1 Mr.A.Sivaji for R4 Mr.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader for R5 Mr.E.C.Ramesh for R7 - - - - -

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)

The Review Application has been filed to review the order dated

27.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.29823 of 2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. The Writ Petition was filed seeking a direction to the fifth respondent to initiate action in pursuance to the notice dated 17.05.2018 in Letter No.EC/S-II/9754/2017 and restore the property as per PP No.332 dated 02.05.2002 and take necessary action for the violations committed by the respondents 1 to 4 along with the eighth respondent in violation of the said sanctioned plan and PP No.332 of the fifth respondent. This Court, vide order dated 27.03.2024 disposed of the Writ Petition holding that a single planning permission having been obtained for construction of 9 blocks, any subsequent sub-division effected, without the permission of all the owners, who had purchased the undivided share, would be an illegal one and therefore, the fifth respondent was directed accordingly.

4. Now, the present review application has been filed for reconsidering the factual matrix pertaining to the Lock and Seal notice dated 17.05.2018 being the disputed fact before C.S.No.535 of 2019 on the file of this Court and also in C.C.No.865 of 2020 before the NCDRC.

5. It is pertinent to note that in the decision of this court reported in

2018 (3) CTC 122 [D.Rajappa and another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9] it is held that differing view disturbing the finality of judgment is not permissible in review.

6. In the case on hand, there is no error apparent on the face of record to review the order passed by this Court in the said Writ Petition. The review Court cannot entertain the arguments touching the merits and demerits of the case and cannot take a different view disturbing the finality of the judgment.

7. In such view of the matter, this Court finds that no ground is made out to review the order dated 27.03.2024. Consequently, Review Application is dismissed. No costs.

[J.N.B., J.] [N.M., J.]

13.09.2024 asi J.NIS