IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
DIWAN MOHIDEEN – Appellant
Versus
THIRUMALAIYANDI KONAR – Respondent
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.10.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN S.A.Nos.1280 & 1289 of 2004
1.S.A(MD)No.1280 of 2004
1.Diwan Mohideen 2.Nainar Mohamed
3.Sethu Uthuman
4.Muthar Mohideen
5.Fathimal Beevi
6.Asanammal @ Mumtaj
7.Meeral
8.Rasul Beevi
9.Barakath
10.Kadeejal Beevi 11.Rahima Begum
12.Ayeeshal ... Appellants 1 to 12/Appellants 3 to 14/
Legal heirs of the deceased Kadar Mohideen Plaintiff Vs.
1.Thirumalaiyandi Konar
2.S.M.Rahmathullah
3.Junior Engineer, Irrigation Department, Tenkasi. ... Respondents 1 to 3/
2nd Appellant & Respondents 1 & 2/
2nd Plaintiff/Defendants 1 & 2 Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 09.02.2001 made in A.S.No.77 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.04.1996 made in O.S.No.117 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengottai.
2.S.A(MD)No.1289 of 2004
1.Diwan Mohideen 2.Nainar Mohamed
3.Sethu Uthuman
4.Muthar Mohideen
5.Fathimal Beevi
6.Asanammal @ Mumtaj
7.Meeral
8.Rasul Beevi
9.Barakath
10.Kadeejal Beevi 11.Rahima Begum
12.Ayeeshal ... Appellants 1 to 12/Appellants 3 to 14/
Legal heirs of the deceased Kadar Mohideen Plaintiff Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by District Collector, Tirunelveli.
2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Veerakeralampudur, Tirunelveli District.
3.S.M.Rahmathullah ... Respondents 1 to 3/Respondents 1 to 3/
Defendants 1 to 3 Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 09.02.2001 made in A.S.No.43 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.04.1996 made in O.S.No.86 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengottai.
COMMON JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.10.2024, there was no representation for the appellants and thereby the matter was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on
24.10.2024.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the Second Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
24.10.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No ps To
1.The Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi.
2.The District Munsif Court, Chengottai.
3.The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
ps Judgment made in S.A.Nos.1280 & 1289 of 2004
24.10.2024
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.