SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 81434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
Raje Sinthya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep. – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.10.2024 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18142 of 2024 Raje Sinthya ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Railway Protection Force, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Railway Protection Force, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kooddankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.357 of 2024)(Zero FIR) ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the respondent to expedite the investigation in Crime No.357 of 2024 (Zero FIR) and file final report within the suitable time with due conditions.

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Elango For R1 & R2 : Mr.G.Vidhya Maheswaran Central Government Counsel For R3 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section

528 B.N.S.S., seeking orders to direct the respondent to expedite the investigation in Crime No.357 of 2024 (Zero FIR) and file final report within the suitable time with due conditions.

2. It is evident from the records that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, Zero FIR came to be registered in Crime No.357 of 2024 on the file of the third respondent and that subsequently, they have recovered the laptop.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though Zero FIR was registered on 09.08.2024, they have not forward the same to the jurisdictional police.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would fairly concede that though zero FIR came to be registered on 09.08.2024, the same is yet to be sent to the jurisdictional police.

5. The very purpose of registering the Zero FIR is that the victim/

defacto complainant should not put to hardship and at the instance of the victim, FIR has to be registered immediately and then the same has to be forwarded to the jurisdictional police without delay. But in the present case, though Zero FIR was registered on 09.08.2024, even after the lapse of two months, they have not forwarded the same to the concerned police. Hence, the third respondent is directed to forward the Zero FIR in Crime No.357 of 2024 along with the property to the second respondent within a period of three days from today.

6. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 25.10.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No csm Note : Issue order copy today (25.10.2024)

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

csm To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Railway Protection Force, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Railway Protection Force, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kooddankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18142 of 2024 Dated: 25.10.2024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top