SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 82981

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
B.SAMSUDEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP.BY – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.02.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.R.C.No.1955 of 2023 B.Samsudeen ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, N-2, Kasimedu Police Station, Kasimedu, Chennai. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.6872 of 2023 dated 26.09.2023 on the file of the Principal Special Court [NDPS Cases], Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sambamurthy For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER The petitioner is the owner of the two wheeler TVS TORG-125, bearing Registration No.TN-03-AD-1966, which was seized by the respondent Police in Crime No.229 of 2023 for offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) and 25 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner filed a petition seeking return of property in Crl.M.P.No.6872 of 2023 before the learned Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai. The learned Principal Special Judge, by order, dated 26.09.2023 dismissed the return of property petition, against which, the present revision has been filed.

2.The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner purchased the vehicle by availing finance from TVS Credit Service. The petitioner used the vehicle for his avocation and for his personal use. The vehicle is kept in open space exposing to vagaries of weather, further detention would make the vehicle unusable, rusted and it would become a scrap. The petitioner is ready to comply with any condition that this Court may impose while granting return of vehicle. It is further submitted that this Court in Crl.R.C.No.1057 of 2023 by order dated 17.07.2023 granted return of vehicle to an accused involved in the offence of similar nature. Hence, he prays for return of property.

3.The Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police filed a counter and submitted that on 28.08.2023 at about 18.10 hours, when the then Sub-Inspector of Police was on station duty, he received an information about the illegal sale of ganja. Then he along with the Police team went to the place of occurrence, i.e., SN City Road, Christian burial ground, wherein they found the accused persons selling ganja. The Police team arrested the accused persons, recorded confession statement and the contraband was seized along with two wheeler TVS Torg- 125 bearing registration No.TN-03-AD-1966 under seizure mahazar in presence of witnesses. Thereafter, an FIR in Crime No.229 of 2023 for offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 and 29(1) of the NDPS Act against the accused persons registered on 28.08.2023. Thereafter, the accused were sent to judicial custody on 29.08.2023 and the seized contraband and the two wheeler produced before the Principal Special Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai. The Inspector of Police sent the samples of contraband to the Forensic Lab, Chennai for chemical analysis and the same was obtained on 07.09.2023.. On collection of evidence and materials, charge sheet filed.

4.He further submitted that the petitioner, owner of the vehicle, filed a petition before the Court below in Crl.M.P.No.6872 of 2023 seeking return of vehicle TVS Torg-125 bearing registration No.TN-03-AD-1966 and the same was dismissed on 26.09.2023. Challenging the same, the present Criminal Revision Case has been filed. He further submitted that this Court in Crl.R.C(MD)No.41 of 2019, dated 16.06.2023 had given directions to the Special Court with regard to disposal of the conveyance articles seized under the NDPS Act. In view of the above, he prays for dismissal of the criminal revision case.

5.Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the materials available on record, it is seen that the petitioner is arrayed as A4 in this case and this Court had already granted return of vehicle to an accused involved in the offence of similar nature. It is seen that from the date of seizure,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top