Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Hemalatha, J
E. Anbarasu – Appellant
Versus
R. Balaji – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. this section presents the foundational facts related to the case and the roles of the parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. this part discusses the legal reasoning and applicable statutes regarding evidence. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Revision Petition is directed against the orders passed in Crl M.P. No.3658/2022 in CC No.7/2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Magisterial Level, Thiruvannamalai.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
i. The petitioner is the accused in CC No.07/2019.
ii. The respondent/complainant filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Thiruvannamalai, against the present Revision Petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter called NI Act).
iii. Summons were issued to the present revision petitioner and on his appearance copies of documents were furnished to him under Section 207 Cr.P.C. The learned trial court judge posted the matter for trial since the revision petitioner/accused pleaded not guilty of the offence.
iv. The respondent/complainant thereafter filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.3658 of 202
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
