SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice J. NISHA BANU
K.SUBRAMANI – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY – Respondent



-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No.19407 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.18681 of 2023 K.Subramani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Additional Secretary (Technical)

Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Zonal officer, Zone No-14, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.6/64, Puzhuthiwakkam Main Road, Chennai-600 091.

3.The Executive Engineer, Zone No-14, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.6/64, Puzhuthiwakkam Main Road, Chennai-600 091.

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, UNIT-41, Zone-14, No.6/64, Puzhuthiwakkam Main Road, Chennai-600 091.

5.The Assistant Engineer, Division- 181, Unit-14, Zone-14, No.6/64, Puzhuthiwakkam Main Road, Chennai-600 091.

-

6.Navaneetham

7.K.Arulvel

8.Vadivel ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the office of the respondents no.3 to 5 vide the Letter No.14/100A/2023 dated 10.06.2023 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad For R-1 : Mr.E.Vijay Anand, Additional Government Pleader For RR 2 to 5 : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Senior Counsel For R-6 : No appearance For R-7 : Mr.G.Jayachandran

O R D E R

Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the office of the respondents 3 to 5 vide the letter dated

10.06.2023 and to quash the same.

2. According to the petitioner, the respondents 6 and 7 are the owners of the vacant land in Survey Numbers 85 and 169 (New Survey Number 271/11), measuring to an extent of 6000 Sq.ft, Kottivakkam village, Tambaram Taluk, kancheepuram District. The petitioner entered into a lease agreement with the respondents 6 and 7 for a period of 11 months and took possession of the property from the date of lease. According to the petitioner the lease was initially renewed for a period of 11 months and thereafter renewed orally. The petitioner was in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the premises as a lessee.

-

3. According to the petitioner, he had invested substantial money for developing his business, which he had conducted in the aforesaid property in the name and style of 'Dream Works”. Because of some misunderstanding between the petitioner and the 6th and 7th respondent, the 8th respondent lodged a complaint at the instigation of the 7th respondent on 08.09.2022 against the petitioner for alleged unauthorised construction put up by him in the subject property. Based on the said complaint, the respondents 2 to 4 issued a notice to the petitioner on 22.12.2022 under Sections 56(2(A)) and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 and locked and sealed the building on 05.01.2023. Prior to the aforesaid action, the respondents 2 to 4 had already sent notices under Section 56(1) and 57 of the Act i.e on 08.10.2022 and a notice for lock and seal was issued on 09.11.2022 and on

-

05.12.2022 a de-occupation notice was issued under Section 57 read with 85 of the said Act.

4. According to the petitioner, none of the said notices were issued to him as an occupier but all notices were served to the 7th respondent and therefore he was not aware of the same. The petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 22.12.2022 issued under Section 56(2(A)) and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, filed special revision petition on 23.01.2023 before the Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai. During the pendency of the said special revision petition the petitioner filed a writ petition in W.P.No.3502 of 2023 for a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose his aforesaid appeal filed under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision petition within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

5. O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top